In 1907 a board stood outside Matlock Bridge Station directing
visitors to some of the beauty spots of the locality or, more
specifically, to "the
High Tor Grounds, Fern Cave, Switzerland view and the refreshment-room".
A newspaper reporter commented that "the
latter direction is a delicious touch of human nature"[1].
There were a number of routes to access the grounds from that
station, shown in the advertisement below. Before this there
had been a basic charge to enter the grounds and a further
penny would admit you to the caves.
|
Advertisement for the grounds, about 1917-18. |
Francis Clay Statham of Starkholmes was manager of the pleasure
grounds from 1887 to at least 1911[2],
and Robert Hall served as the secretary for many years[3].
Job Smith was Chairman of the High Tor Recreation Ground Company
Limited when he passed away in 1907[4];
it was one of many enterprises he was involved with. Although not
all the directors from that time are known, Tom Wright, J.P., of
Darley was also a director that year[5].
In 1916 the grounds needed a new manager. Rather tellingly, " Men
of military age not accepted"[6].
Mr. F. Atkinson was manager in 1923.
Walter F. Dakin had taken over as secretary from Robert Hall.
The ground's manager in the mid-1930s was Albert John Fudge. In
1935 he summoned a lead miner who lived on Church Street and had
been seen with a ferret on High Tor; it was said he was searching
for conies (rabbits), so he was presumably poaching. A local constable
had found him with a bag, a ferret and some rabbits which was something
of a giveaway. Despite claiming he was trying to train the ferret,
the culprit was fined and advised the leave the rabbits well alone
in future![6]
Two years later, in 1937, the management of the Recreation Ground
possibly had a sudden rush to their heads as they erected an aluminium
coloured sign, with the words High Tor on it; it was placed right
in the centre of the rock face! It seems a bizarre thing to have
done. Needless to say, there were a number of complaints and the
matter was debated by the Council who then wrote to the Company.
There was a second discussion following the Company's response;
Councillor Beddington commented that the rock advertised itself and
a second letter requesting the removal was sent[6].
|